Google Antigravity: The Free IDE That Challenges Cursor and Claude Code
Google entered the war of IDEs with artificial intelligence and did not come to play. Antigravity is Google's new agent-first IDE -- free during preview, based on a fork of VS Code and with benchmarks that put Cursor and Claude Code on notice. If you work with code, digital marketing or any area that involves creating things on the computer, you need to understand what is happening.
In this article, we'll open up Antigravity from the inside: how the architecture works, what models it supports, what the 76.2% benchmark on SWE-bench means, how it compares to Cursor and Claude Code, and most importantly,When it makes sense to use each of these tools.
Step 4: first project
Open the agent command bar (Ctrl+Shift+A or Cmd+Shift+A on Mac) and describe what you want. For example: "Create a REST API with Express.js that manages a list of tasks, with CRUD endpoints and input validation." The agent will plan, show the plan and execute it after approval.
Step 5: explore
Try different types of tasks. Ask to refactor existing code. Ask to write tests. Ask to explain a complex passage. Ask to create documentation. The more you use it, the more you will understand where Antigravity shines and where it has limitations.
11. The future of IDEs with AI
Google's entry changes the game permanently. Until now, the AI IDE market was dominated by startups (Cursor, Windsurf) and Anthropic (Claude Code). With Google bringing the weight of its models, infrastructure and user base, competition intensifies dramatically.
What to expect in the next 12 months
- Falling prices:With Antigravity free in preview, Cursor and others will need to justify the price or offer more aggressive tiers. This is good for everyone
- Multi-agent as standard:What is now a distinguishing feature of Antigravity will become a mandatory feature. Cursor and Claude Code will intensify their multi-agent implementations
- Integration with native cloud:IDEs that connect directly to cloud providers (one-click deployment, automatic preview, integrated CI/CD) will be the next battleground
- Specialization:Generalist IDEs will coexist with specialized IDEs -- for mobile, for data science, for marketing tech, for DevOps. Each niche will have its optimized tool
- Skills as an ecosystem:Claude Code's concept of skills points to a future where IDEs have "app stores" of specializations. You install a skill and the IDE becomes an expert in any domain
The professional who will benefit most is not the one who chooses one tool and ignores the others. And those who understand the strengths of each one, use the right one for each context and invest in skills that enhance any tool.
Did you choose Claude Code? Now boost it.
You've already seen that Claude Code is superior. The next step is to give him superpowers with ready-made skills: marketing, SEO, dev, copy, automation. All for $9, lifetime access.
Ativar Superpoderes — $9FAQ
Yes, during the preview period Google Antigravity is completely free, including access to Gemini models. Google has not yet officially announced post-preview prices, but the expectation is that it will maintain a generous free tier with usage limits, similar to what it does with other products such as Firebase and Colab. Even when you start charging, the tendency is for the free tier to serve the majority of individual developers.
Antigravity supports multiple models. In addition to the native Gemini models (Gemini 3 Pro Preview, Gemini 3 Flash), you can connect Claude Opus 4.6, Claude Sonnet and other models via API. Just add your API key in the settings. This makes the tool flexible for those who already have a preference for a specific model or want to combine the best of each one.
It depends on your profile. If you want zero cost and already use the Google ecosystem, Antigravity is a solid choice. If you need deep integration with the terminal and prefer specialized skills, Claude Code remains superior in this regard. If you want a mature visual IDE with Tab completion as a reference, Cursor still has advantages. Many professionals are using more than one tool depending on the context -- and this is probably the smartest approach.